While sco has yet to provide any publicly available substantial evidence in their case against ibm and linux, timeline inc has already won a us. The biggest threat to linux may not lie in the ultimate merits of scos case. Free and opensource software advocates saw the matter as a cause celebre, and the awardwinning foss legal news site groklaw got its start. The truth is that the scos lawsuit against ibm could have farreaching implications in the industry, and i need to present the story in a way that i. Sco says ibm released a sham version of monterey os to prop up aix for power. Today, were stating that the alleged actions of ibm and others have caused customers to use a tainted product at sco s expense. Since suing ibm in march over allegations that the company put sco unix source code into linux, sco has been countersued by both ibm and linux distributor red hat.
It is an attempt to explain the current actions of ibm against sco in regard to linux. To make linux of necessary quality for use by enterprise customers, it must be redesigned so that linux also becomes the software equivalent of a luxury car. Sco and ibm have been engaged in a legal dispute over ibms contributions to. To make sense of what he says, one has to know what are the things he claims and names methods and concepts. Ibm wins a victory in a legal battle with sco group when a judge orders sco to show the linux software to which it believes it. Scos contract dispute with ibm has been accompanied by a smear campaign against the whole gnu linux system. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets. Sco vs groklaws pamela jones unix and linux dslreports. Sco pulls ibms aix license in unix dispute computerworld.
It is a contract dispute between two companies with. Unix on intels 32bit and 64bit architectures, to benefit ibms linux business. At the end of last october, the 10th circuit issued an opinion overturning the lower courts summary judgement in favor of ibm on one of sco s claims, sending it back to the lower court for trial. Jun 17, 20 judge dale kimball, who had presided over the sco vs ibm case in 2005, noted that. But sco made an obvious mistake when it erroneously quoted me as saying that linux is a copy of unix.
Sco claimed that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibm s linux business. The seemingly endless legal battle between sco and ibm battle over who owns unix, and perhaps bits of linux, too has reemerged. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious. The scolinux disputes are a series of legal and public disputes between the software company sco group sco and various linux vendors and users. That case, which is scheduled to be tried later this year, is the one for which sco is attempting. Debian still refers to its software as gnulinux today. Jones has led a relentless online crusade against software maker sco group, posting thousands of articles bashing the company for suing ibm over the linux. The author of this piece seems pretty sure linux will be unaffected by the outcome of this case. Ibm, novell and red hat have ongoing claims against sco. Sco sued ibm in 2003 for violating its intellectual property after. Sco and ibm have been engaged in a legal dispute over ibm s contributions to linux since sco sued the. At the end of last october, the 10th circuit issued an opinion overturning the lower courts summary judgement in favor of ibm on one of scos claims, sending it back to the lower court for trial.
Sco, gnu and linux gnu project free software foundation. Members of the linux community disagree with scos claims. Sco was a real unix vendor which was bought by caldera a then respected linux vendor. The decade long legal dispute has descended into a morass of litigation and allegations. Therefore, scocaldera may accuse ibm of misappropriating scoowned software to improve the linux kernel only if that software does not actually ship with the. Scos legal war against ibm and linux comes to an end zdnet. Viewed against the backdrop of scos plethora of public statements concerning ibms and others infringement of scos purported s to the unix software, it is astonishing that sco has not offered any competent evidence to create a disputed fact. The biggest threat to linux may not lie in the ultimate merits of sco s case. The big trial over ownership of linux has all but been resolved and its clear that sco has lost. The thing that makes predictions a bit murky is that there are some other motions, aside from the summary judgment motions, that were also not officially decided before. They then demanded royalties over anyone that used linux. The project was terminated in may 2001, sco says, alleging that ibm misused its access to the unix software code to help build the linux open standard. Microsoft may be the only winner in scos lawsuit against ibm and the open source ideal.
Ibm cant enforce gpl software license computerworld. Sco will need to show how it is able to claim rights to code that it did not create, and that ibm has used in various nonsystem v software platforms. Nearly onehalf of scocaldera income from ip licensing and enforcement. May 31, 2003 nzheretic writes, if you are concerned over the treat of lawsuits over intellectual property then you are actually in a better legal position using gpled linux than using microsofts products. The complaint alleged that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibm s linux business. Sco lawsuit is worse for linux than ibm network world.
Sco lost its legal battle against ibm and linux long ago, but now the. Scocaldera suit against ibm over unix and linux issues. Scos contract dispute with ibm has been accompanied by a smear campaign against the whole gnulinux system. Sco claimed that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibms linux business. The sco linux disputes are a series of legal and public disputes between the software company sco group and various linux vendors and users. Ibm linuxone enterprise linux servers and solutions for a high performing, secure and scalable linux infrastructure. Sco challenged ibm in the courts claiming that code used in linux was owned by them. Big blue is hitting back against sco s charges that it misappropriated unix trade secrets and used them in linux. Ibm sco says ibm released a sham version of monterey os to prop up aix for power. The sco group asserted that there are legal uncertainties regarding the use of the linux operating system due to alleged violations of ibms unix licenses in the development of linux code at ibm. Mar, 2020 the other day i was asked what the odds were that sco would win against ibm. We believe that some of the sco software code that has ended up in the linux operating system got there through this route.
If the case drags on, most companies in this highly. Prior to ibm s involvement, linux was the software equivalent of a bicycle. Learn how ibm linuxone delivers a secure data server and a hybrid cloud infrastructure in a single enterprise platform. Difference between ibm and sco basics of ibm and sco ibm, short for international business machines, is a global information technology and. Scos ceo was quoted in news services on may 29 as having said. Novell vs sco to novells knowledge, the 1995 agreement governing scos purchase. Sco made initial ip claims against ibm in march 6th 20032, and only removed the source code to its linux distribution in may 14th 20033 thus sco have gifted this code to the linux community. Following the partial summary judgment rulings in the sco vs novell slander of title. Nzheretic writes, if you are concerned over the treat of lawsuits over intellectual property then you are actually in a better legal position using gpled linux than using microsofts products.
As linux is developed by the community and available for free, the. Prior to ibms involvement, linux was the software equivalent of a bicycle. As ibm later contributed plenty of code to linux, and used some sco code in a test version of aix. Nuffer noted that he is new to the case and will require all the parties involved to supply him with sufficient details to mull over. On the basis of how the two parties were behaving, i offered a range of between 55 and 65 percent. Filed a few months ago, sco s lawsuit against ibm has rankled the linux community and disconcerted its users. Ibm legal battle over linux may finally be finished. Ibm lawsuit wont go to trial until a related case, sco vs. Ibm case in early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference, unfair competition and breach of contract. Big blue is hitting back against scos charges that it misappropriated unix trade secrets and used them in linux. Prior to ibms involvement, linux was the software equivalent. In 1992, the yggdrasil project chose the name yggdrasil linuxgnux for its combination of software. Computers software operating systems unix sco boycott, lawsuits torvalds, linus.
Shortly thereafter, ibm filed for a rehearing en banc. But sco alleged that ibm had no real interest in the project and just wanted to see what was inside its versions of unix. Appeals court keeps alive the neverending linux case, sco. November 12, 2003 jed boal, from ksl 5 tvs eyewitness news, provides an overview on sco vs. Linus torvalds comments on scocalderas linuxrelated allegations. The legal action the sco group brought against ibm on thursday has nothing to do with linux or the. Filed a few months ago, scos lawsuit against ibm has rankled the linux community and disconcerted its users. In essence, sco has argued that ibm essentially stole, or. Novell among them, a status conference hearing was held before judge david nuffer on june 11, 2015. The battle over unix set to be replayed as sco takes on ibm. In early 2003, sco filed a lawsuit against ibm for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference, unfair competition and breach of contract.
Sep 25, 2009 november 12, 2003 jed boal, from ksl 5 tvs eyewitness news, provides an overview on sco vs. The complaint alleged that ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibms linux business. In 1995 and 1996, sco acquired the rights of unix and unixware software. Mar 04, 20 initially, there was some debate over what these distributions should be called. Linux is a trademark of one linus torvalds, of whom you may have heard. Now, scos argument is that even if they did distribute linux, they werent aware of their code allegedly being in linux. Appeals court keeps alive the neverending linux case, sco v. Ibm wins a victory in a legal battle with sco group when a judge orders sco to show the linux software to which it believes it has rights and point out. Nov 02, 2017 coronavirus data centre software security devops business personal. Sco sues ibm for sharing secrets with unix and linux. Today, were stating that the alleged actions of ibm and others have caused customers to use a tainted product at scos expense.
Sco claimed to have found more code inside of linux, on the top of what ibm alleged to have already added. This category is for links that are mostly or all about linus torvalds, aspects of, and involvement in, the sco vs. Sco v ibm sco v linux sco v all of us what should we do about it, if anything. The sco group alleges that its license agreements with ibm means that source code that ibm wrote and donated to be incorporated into linux was added in violation of scos contractual rights. This machinelearning upstart trained software to snare online drug dealers. The sco vs ibm lawsuit has been reopened after us judge david nuffer granted scos motion for reconsideration. Gnulinux is the preferred term advanced by richard stallman and the free software foundation. The other day i was asked what the odds were that sco would win against ibm. Not many lawsuits, and certainly not this one, deserve to be called the trial of the century. Sco sues ibm for sharing secrets with unix and linux slashdot. If the case drags on, most companies in this highly competitive,fastchanging industry, cant afford to place bets on technology with an uncertain future. Sco v ibm cont friday the th deadline ibm made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of unix, particularly unix on intel, to benefit ibms new linux services business, sco.
961 993 427 1127 1472 127 1041 29 84 8 1413 1471 1429 634 1433 424 1061 163 91 1547 1505 247 688 1464 1242 341 654 1567 838 46 1417 274 97 530 1420 1245 1410 266 1435 1329